After the new editorial test, the new Ford Focus looks better than its predecessor. It didn't work without stumbling.
It's a cliché. The new car is better than the old one. This is my news. Particularly surprising is the opposite. This old was better than the new one. This happens. However, there is no single manufacturer in segment C. If I want to produce cars, but also sell them, they must listen carefully to their customers, journalists and their own engineers. Ford did it. The focus in each category is improved by the customer's interest. It wasn't without … First impressions and concepts in short and fresh video:
The biggest, however, is undoubtedly the retreat from the rear seats. Ford has joined the criteria and competes. Instead of a specific Ford multilater, the rear weaker specifications have a torsion bar that has a rear arm. A simpler version. Its main purpose is to be enough. This is not a big goal, but it still raises a question. Enough?
It's pretty clear. When you can compromise yourself and go hard in yourself, there will be enough compromise. But it will be a compromise. One day may not be enough. So philosophy about the immortality of the shell.
The car is very nice. First, you get good sound insulation and comfortable settings. Even our broken Slovakian roads are treating the report, and even the worst sections (for humanity) are so much better than you expected. She died better than I expected.
Riding is amazing, fun. The radiation is a pleasant, style-like style. The limitation is a weaker aggregate, but fast enough to call pirates with others. The trolley trace leads, and cross bends in the bend do not cause the assistants or the light rescue units to flash. So if at least self-sacrifice is a fundamental form. The car leans better than before. Bullying against intimidation can also be better handled than anticipated by the technique used. But the enthusiasm doesn't call the car. You will not take her hand off, you will not be shocked. Driving and even a semi-rigid shaft can handle the cockpit better than most riders. What will be lost on the shaft will be the weight reduction and the rigidity of the structure. There is no other way to assert that driving characteristics are, on the whole, better than the engine.
The engine is also new. With the latest generation of trilobal labels, EcoBoost 1.0 can turn off one of the cylinders if needed, or just burn two. It is harder to pull out than it seems. The car is not communicating anywhere, no light icon, no announcement. However, a rough, low-load run and some gentle response to the gentle throttle pedal are already indicated by the presence of a roll release system.
The most demanding is the first few kilometers behind the wheel of the vehicle. As if the accelerator pedal was as boring as the engine would be lazy. And really … Just stop this later.
Lack of lightning responses at higher speeds. The engine is a bit cruel to the previously decorated willingness and distinguishes it from its competitors. As if the reflection would have worn more than the other tests in the volume category. These are minor differences, but they can shoot. We need to focus on them. Or rather not concentrate. Easy to solve. He spent more on the engine, so that the cylinder only opened in a quiet way at a steady speed, and learned to stamp the gas better than it needed in the past.
Average consumption is 6.2 liters of gasoline every 100 km during the test. This is a 50% downhill run, 40% of the journey and 10% of the city. The longer I ride with the car, the more worried I am about the higher speed engine. Consumption has surprisingly affected at least this.
Disconnecting the cylinder in no way affects the flexibility of the engine. All three cylinders can be filled with fuel. The intelligent turbocharger responds instantly, with good spreading and gas responses improving your driving experience. For a better experience, be sure to pay the sport mode button occasionally. In the case of manual transmission, the impact is not so great, but only after the Sport button is pressed. Here you go faster … In the fourth stage, the flexible acceleration between 80 and 120 km / h was between 9.54 and 9.7 seconds. The engine also carries the third stage of the test, which takes about 8 seconds. Flexibility is therefore enough to work comfortably. On shorter sections, more cars should be well thought out. If you don't want to think about it, go for a stronger bike. I believe in the strength of a 1.5 liter four-cylinder. It seems to be ideal for the new Focus.
Traffic noise measured at 120 km / h peaked at 66-67 dB. The results were badly distorted by the fine rain and the negative side wind. The noise is very low and compares the best.
Furthermore, BandO's premium sound system is a great testimony. This greatly improves the quality of the music provided. Especially your own footage or streaming music is very nice. The much more expensive systems are much more expensive in cars, even without the noisy noise of the subwoofer. I definitely recommend this add-on, especially if you spend a lot of time in the car.
A great plus is undoubtedly the connection with smart devices with CarPlay and Android Auto. No need for a phone owner, but a good data program is needed. I can't combine the trip with Waza and Spotifay. And the radio broadcasters will have nothing to eat … But in the endless cycle, they deserve the waste going to the ether.
But back to Focus. LED lamps are diameter. While in full darkness the passing and driving lights are very well lit and illuminate an appropriate roadway at both ends, wet, dark even in full darkness, their performance is less pleasant. Leading the illuminated city (all cities and villages) in the rain is extremely dazzling in the light of light, and the visibility of illuminated pedestrians, cyclists and animals is significantly reduced. I'd call it a lower average. Both lights and fog lights overwrite this deficiency. The capabilities of LED lamps do not exceed the bi-xenon capabilities previously used by Ford. You are more pleasant, slightly yellowish and more intense. The car was connected to xenon headlamps (behind Focus CMAX) and the difference was remarkable. Even if I don't consider the higher importance in MPV. CMAX has further improved its performance with a static screw. But this does not change the fact that Focus LEDs compete with competitors and shine well.
The spaciousness of the cab leads to a sense of processing quality. Focus replaced the huge dashboard and the bold center panel for more cost-effective solutions and brought great benefits to it. The rear passenger area has sharply improved. Unless the numbers do not reflect badly. This is no wonder, but with more space for the driver and passenger legs, there is even more space behind. I have no reserves like my colleague. However, the backrest leads to a smaller slope. There are more space and width on the back. Above the head, the bid is not significantly higher, but whoever wants more is a car. The trolley offer is also acceptable and has 375 liters.
So let's summarize. The car drives well, the engine hasn't changed in dynamics and consumption can be reduced slightly. The car is smoother, more comfortable. It offers a high level of extra equipment, more space for all passengers, and more security thanks to security systems. The new LEDs are well lit, even if the latest versions of bi-xenon are still odd. The car is good, the look is quite charming. Working, man, more about dynamism about consumption and safety, this version is great. The car does not attract the generation of the past, on the contrary, it can offer them even more. Going well, has plenty of equipment, looks fresh, gets a few pounds, offers more space, the engine can be more economical. There are not many parameters where intergenerational degradation can be found and the previous generation is not an evil car. I wonder about the estate and the stronger the engine and the more expensive chassis. 7.5 points out of 10 points.
Here you can find a video at youtube.com