Disputing Trump, Barr said there is no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) – Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday that the Department of Justice has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

His remarks in an interview with the Associated Press came despite President Donald Trump’s repeatedly unsubstantiated allegations that the election was stolen, Trump sought to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, and refused to acknowledge the loss of President-elect Joe Biden. .

Barr said U.S. lawyers and FBI agents were working to follow up on complaints and information they received, but found no evidence to change the election results. Barr later headed to the White House for a previously scheduled meeting.

“To date, we have not seen any level of fraud that could have achieved a different result in the election,” Barr told the AP.

The remarks come in particular from Barr, who was one of the president’s most ardent allies. He raised the idea several times before the election that voter fraud by mail may be particularly vulnerable to fraud committed during the coronavirus epidemic, as Americans feared going to the polls and voting by letter instead.

Shortly after Barr’s statement was released, Trump tweeted more unfounded allegations of voter fraud. Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer and campaigner issued a large-scale statement stating that “with full respect for the Attorney General, there was no appearance” of the investigation.

Last month, Barr issued a directive to U.S. lawyers across the country that allowed them to pursue “significant allegations” of voting irregularities., if they existed, were proven before the 2020 presidential election, even though there was no evidence of widespread fraud at the time. This memorandum allowed prosecutors to exercise caution in the long-standing policy of the Ministry of Justice, which would generally prohibit such open action before elections are justified. Shortly after his release, the department’s chief election criminal officer announced that he was stepping down from this post because of the reminder.

The Trump campaign team, led by Rudy Giuliani, referred to a widespread conspiracy Democrats to throw millions of illegal votes into the system without evidence. Several lawsuits were filed in the battlefield states, claiming that partisan pollsters were not clear enough about their views of polling stations in certain rooms, so something illegal had to happen. The allegations have been rejected several times, including by Republican judges who have ruled that the lawsuits have no evidence. Local Republicans in some battlefield states followed Trump with similar unsupported demands.

Trump protested against the election in tweets and interviews, although according to his own administration, the 2020 election was the safest ever. Trump recently allowed his administration to begin the transition to Biden, but he still refused to admit he lost.

The issues raised by Trump’s campaign and his allies are common to all elections: Problems with signatures, confidentiality envelopes, and postal markings on postal ballot papers, as well as the possibility that a small number of ballot papers are incorrect or lost.

But federal rehearsals were also requested for the claims. Attorney Sidney Powell spun fictional tales of reversing the vote, German servers storing U.S. voting information and election software created in Venezuela “on the instructions of Hugo Chavez” – the late Venezuelan president who died in 2013. Powell has since been removed from the legal team for an interview, where he threatened to “blow up” Georgia with a “biblical” court filing.

Barr did not name Powell specifically, but said, “There was an allegation that would be systemic fraud, and that would claim that the machines were essentially programmed to bias election results. And DHS and the DOJ have looked into that, and so far we haven’t seen anything to support that, ”Barr said.

He says people confuse the application of the federal criminal justice system with allegations in civil lawsuits. According to him, such a remedy for such complaints would be a top-down inspection by state or local officials, not the U.S. Department of Justice.

“There’s a growing trend to use the criminal justice system as some sort of default solution, and people don’t like something they want the Department of Justice to come in and investigate,” Barr said.

He said it must first be substantiated to believe that there is a crime that needs to be investigated.

“Most fraud claims are about very specific circumstances or actors or behavior. Non – systematic claims and. And these were demolished; they run down, ”Barr said. “Some were wide-ranging and potentially covered a few thousand votes. They were followed.

In a campaign statement, Giuliani stated that “in at least six states, enough evidence has been gathered for illegal voting that has not been investigated”.

“Many of our witnesses swear under oath that they have committed crimes in connection with voter fraud. To the best of our knowledge, the DOJ did not conduct any interviews. The Department of Justice also did not inspect any of the voting machines and did not use its subpoena to establish the truth, ”he said.

Witnesses Giuliani pointed out earlier included Jessy Jacob, who was identified as an employee of the city of Detroit, who said in a statement to the court that he saw other workers teaching voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrats.

But the judge, who rejected a bid to block verification of the Detroit constituency’s election results, noted that Jacob’s allegations of misconduct and fraud do not include “date, location, frequency, or names of employees” and that Biden won only with unofficial results. Michigant.