Miranda Devine calls the Nevada 2020 presidential review “good news”

A Nevada judge reviewing evidence from Trump’s legal team is “good news,” New York Post columnist Miranda Devine said on Thursday.

“This is good news because we are finally seeing the claims tested in court. Witnesses must speak under oath and put their money where their mouth is. So far, it’s really pointless, as Lindsey Graham just said, there are videos and public hearings in which people articulate these allegations. It makes no sense, ”Devine told America’s Newsroom.

“There will be no difference in overthrowing the election result. It upsets and upset people. They give out a lot of misinformation. So you have to go to court and prove it, ”he added.


Trump 2020 campaign attorneys and representatives of Joe Biden’s six Nevada constituencies investigated the vote count in Carson City on Tuesday in connection with a Trump team-run voter fraud lawsuit.

The reactions of the two parties were not immediately known before the scheduled trial on Thursday.

State Judge James Russell in Carson City cleared the way before Monday’s joint inspection.

The Trump campaign disputes the results of the November 3 election in the state, which said Democrat Biden won by 50.1% of the vote, compared to Trump’s 47.7%, according to the Fox News Decision Desk.

According to data compiled by Fox, Biden won more than 703,000 voters, Trump received nearly 670,000 – less than 35,000 votes cast.

Overturning the election is a “big hurdle” to overcoming, as the election results of several states need to be discussed, Devine said. He stressed the importance of mistrust in the election results, which is a cause for concern.

“It’s a good thing because right now, almost half of Americans, according to a Rasmussen survey, have 47% who think there’s something cunning about this choice, something faint in Joe Biden’s victory. Among them are 75% of Republican voters and 30% of Democrats, ”Devine said.

CLICK HERE to receive Fox News news

“So this is a widespread suspicion among the population as to whether or not this choice was legitimate,” he added. “The reason for this is because of the widespread postal mailing lists that most countries don’t use because they are so vulnerable to fraud. Whether fraud has existed and can be proven is widespread fraud, who knows?”

Fox News Dom Calicchio contributed to this report.