Representative of the Republic Mo BrooksMorris (Mo) Jackson BrooksHillicon Valley: House votes to condemn QAnon Americans worried about foreign election interference DHS has confirmed a request to call protest phones. The House approves a measure condemning QAnon, but 17 Republicans are voting against the Night Defense: Trump hosts Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain for a historic signature. The LA Air Force reveals that it secretly flew and flew a new fighter jet. LA coronavirus causes delay in Pentagon Research on alternatives to eternal chemicals MORE (Ala.) On Wednesday, he told reporters that he plans to challenge the votes of the Electoral College when Congress meets and confirms the election of the elected president. Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump refers to a possible 2024 remark by the White House. Tiger King’s lawyer believes they are close to Trump Cruz’s pardon. on January 6.
Brooks reiterated his plans for The Hill President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump refers to the 2024 case in the White House, noting that Trump is vetoing the defense bill for technical liability protectionwithout evidence, alleges widespread voter fraud in the 2020 elections. Politico first reported the news.
“I do this because I think this is the most serious election theft in U.S. history. And if there was a way to determine the outcome of the Electoral College only on the basis of legitimate votes cast by eligible U.S. citizens, then Donald Trump won the Electoral College, ”he told The Hill in an interview.
“I’m not focusing on what’s involved in legal submissions in these lawsuits across the country. There are some votes that were probably illegal in some places, to some degree. This is not so abnormal, ”he added.
The Alabama Republican said he said the issue goes beyond the court cases launched by the Trump campaign, arguing that Congress is better placed to look into the case.
“It is extremely difficult in court to determine how many illegal votes were cast and to whom they were cast. And that’s one of the reasons the FBI, the Department of Justice and the federal judiciary are completely incapable of dealing with the problem, ”he said.
“And one of the reasons the writers of the U.S. Constitution decided that it would not be wise for federal courts to have even the Supreme Court as the arbitrator,” he added.
According to Brooks, “there are much broader, much larger systemic flaws in the U.S. electoral system.”
“The first is the 1993 National Voting Rights Act, passed by the Democratic House and the Democratic Senate through Congress and signed by a Democratic president over objections from Republican congressmen and Republican senators,” he said.
“The main evil of the law is that it makes it illegal for electoral registrars to prove citizenship before someone gives them permission to vote. So it alone opens the gates for illegal aliens and other non-citizens to register to vote, ”he added.
Brooks also said he sees voter person laws as an area that needs to be strengthened.
While allegations of voter fraud have been made by a number of Republicans, little evidence has been presented to substantiate the allegations.
“There is no zero evidence that whether or not dozens of people would vote in this or any other election,” David Becker, executive director of the Center for Electoral Innovation and Research, told Politifact.
Brooks does not disclose “any direct or indirect communication” with senators or their staff, but actively seeks a legislature in the House of Lords to join his effort. He also said he was not in contact with the White House to discuss the move.
The legislature, who is also a member of the Conservative Freedom Caucus, told Politico that he had discussed the procedural maneuver with some members of the GOP leadership, but they did not give him a “thumb” or “down”.
The congressman said he could continue to object to the vote if no one decided to join him, acknowledging that it served as a symbolic protest rather than a powerful challenge to the election result.
Trump’s ally has repeatedly defended the president, claiming that Biden “won an illegal victory” a November 7 tweet“There is no way for me to vote in the House to confirm the votes of the electoral bodies of states where illegal votes have distorted the will of the people in those states who have voted legally.”
Several courts have dismissed Trump’s legal team’s lawsuits regarding voter fraud and voting irregularities, and ruled that there was no evidence to substantiate these allegations.
The news arrives at Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThunePressure builds on coronavirus relief, no clear path to McConnell after offering new coronavirus clearance bill after talks with Mnuchin, Meadows Murkowski: Trump must admit White House contest (SD), Senate Republican No. 2 told reporters on Wednesday that he considered it unlikely that anyone would object to the voter ID.
“I can’t imagine this ever happening,” Thune said, adding that while a Republican is “able” to stand up and object, he doubts he’s “going anywhere”.
“It’s a well-established process,” he continued.
However, Norman Ornstein from Washington, the DC-based American Enterprise Institute think tank he told reporters on a call Wednesday that while he considers it likely that at least one House of Representatives and one senator will act to attack a voter, he does not believe this will have a significant impact on the election result.
“What happens is that the House and the Senate meet together, and if a challenge arises, they go back to their own chamber and resolve the issue,” Ornstein explained. “It can happen pretty quickly. I would think there would be no significant debate, although there could be some debate before it gets votes. ”
He added that he did not suspect that the debates would continue for more than a day, adding that I think it was extremely unlikely that there would be plenty of numbers who would vote against the electorate and change the outcome.
“It’s just a matter of how long it takes,” Ornstein said.
Jordain Carney contributed to the report.