Stimulus talking nebulizer – POLITICO

Senate Republicans at a private conference of the party party on Tuesday fought over whether it would be feasible to close a deal trading in two at all. McConnell then called on negotiators to stop accountability reform and state and local support from the meeting, making them too controversial to be operational at the sleazy, lame duck meeting.

According to people familiar with the call, Retired Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) Was a close-knit Alliance of McConnell among speakers who opposed spending billions to help the entire state of the country. In an interview, Alexander said that after its revenue grows, states like his do not need support: “Our goal should be schools, colleges, childcare and individual aid. Put money in people’s pockets, not states. “

By Wednesday morning, the division among Republicans over the $ 908 billion bipartisan proposal meant influential senators from the GOP believed the talks should be kicked off by the party’s leadership, not left to senior senators.

“This will be discussed by the four corners,” Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) said, citing party leaders. The bipartisan group “came up with some ideas and I think they can talk about a lot of things that a [spending bill], but the fact is that we won’t have a standalone Covid 19 bill.

Both McConnell and President Nancy Pelosi say coronavirus help should be included in the year-end spending package.

The bipartisan group of lawmakers released its framework for spending on education, health, transport and small business on Wednesday morning, although it outlined little detail on how to bridge the gap between parties over the shield of responsibility and municipal money. In the coming days, the group hopes to draft legislation.

Senator Joe Manchin (DW.Va.), the leader of the bipartisan talks, said that if Republicans leave the group’s work, they “should respond to the American public”.

“I think there’s enough Republican who says, ‘Wait a minute, it’s not going to go,'” Manchin said. “We’re the only two-party game in town.”

Senator John Thune (RS.D.) said the bipartisan group had begun talks. But he said talks between Senate minority leader McConnell, Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and domestic minority leader Kevin McCarthy will be decisive – not whether a group of senators will be able to reach an agreement that badly divides Senate Republicans.

“Overall, the most diluting aspect of any of these proposals in Republican votes in the Senate is the state and local. There is no question about it. It bleeds Republicans, ”said Thune, the party’s leading vote counter. “It would be very problematic if there was state and local funding inside.”

But party leaders in both chambers spent more time publicizing each other’s ideas than anything else. Pelosi and McConnell spoke last week about the need for a bipartisan agreement, the first meaningful debate between the two to begin within weeks. The staff spoke more recently, congressional aides said.

Since then, he has mostly been pointing fingers between the two leaders – Pelosi McConnell called Tuesday’s proposal “shocking” and the Kentucky Republican with a return fire, saying Wednesday that he and Schumer’s reaction to Tuesday’s $ 916 billion bailout was “schizophrenic”.

And Democratic leaders continued to push for bipartisan negotiations to be the only way forward, rethinking McConnell’s proposal to halt talks on state and local funding and also rejecting Finance Minister Steven Mnuchin’s offer. After McConnell accused Schumer of not accepting the latest counter-offers, Schumer said that “everything McConnell’s leader did was just a party, just like in the White House, but this bipartisan group has real hope”.

Steny Hoyer, the leader of the majority in the House, reiterated his support for bipartisan talks on Wednesday, but also acknowledged that there was little time to reach an agreement. “We have to do this,” Hoyer told reporters. “And whatever it is, be it Pelosi speaker and Chief McConnell, in a room, and an agreement has been made.

Republican officials have questioned how many of their members would support short-term accountability for $ 160 billion in local government. Some less than half of Senate Republicans are willing to support an agreement around the exchange.

Even if a significant bloc of Senate Republicans is lost with the $ 908 billion agreement, Democrats say it would still exceed the Senate’s 60-vote threshold. And since the time for the lame duck is coming to an end, they say it’s the best – and only – game.

– He’s taking on the $ 908 billion deal. Will you get all the Democratic votes? Probably not. Of course, you don’t get all the Republican votes. But it will still pass. Put it on the damn floor, ”said Senator Jon Tester (D-Mont.).